Select Page

PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) and CPM (Critical Path Method) are two project management techniques used to plan, schedule, and control complex projects. While they have some differences, they both help in organizing, coordinating, and managing tasks to ensure timely completion of projects. Here’s an introduction to PERT and CPM:

PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique):

PERT is a statistical tool used for planning and scheduling projects that involve a high degree of uncertainty. It was developed in the late 1950s by the U.S. Navy and Booz Allen Hamilton to manage the Polaris submarine missile program. Key features of PERT include:

  1. Probabilistic Time Estimates: PERT uses three time estimates for each activity: optimistic time (O), pessimistic time (P), and most likely time (M). These estimates are used to calculate the expected duration of each activity using a weighted average (TE = (O + 4M + P) / 6).
  2. Critical Path: PERT identifies the critical path, which is the longest path through the project network that determines the minimum project duration. Activities on the critical path have zero slack or float, meaning any delay in these activities will directly impact the project’s overall duration.
  3. Probability Analysis: PERT allows project managers to assess the probability of completing the project within a given time frame by considering the variability in activity durations. This helps in risk management and decision-making.

CPM (Critical Path Method):

CPM is a deterministic method used for planning, scheduling, and controlling projects that have well-defined activity durations. It was developed in the late 1950s by DuPont and Remington Rand. Key features of CPM include:

  1. Deterministic Time Estimates: CPM uses a single time estimate for each activity, typically the most likely time (M) or expected duration. This simplifies the analysis but requires more accurate estimates compared to PERT.
  2. Critical Path: Like PERT, CPM identifies the critical path, which is the longest path through the project network. Activities on the critical path have zero slack or float, and any delay in these activities will delay the project’s completion.
  3. Resource Allocation: CPM allows project managers to allocate resources efficiently by identifying resource-constrained activities and optimizing resource utilization.

Commonalities:

  • Both PERT and CPM use network diagrams (such as Precedence Diagramming Method – PDM) to represent project activities and their dependencies.
  • They help in identifying the sequence of activities, estimating project duration, and determining the critical path.
  • Both techniques assist project managers in monitoring and controlling project progress, identifying potential delays, and making necessary adjustments to keep the project on track.

In summary, PERT and CPM are powerful tools for project management, each with its own strengths and applications. PERT is useful for projects with uncertainty and variability, while CPM is more suitable for projects with well-defined activities and durations. By employing these techniques, project managers can effectively plan, schedule, and execute projects to achieve their objectives within the specified time and budget constraints.