Select Page

Design for six sigma

Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) is a systematic approach to design products or services that meet customer requirements and achieve Six Sigma quality levels. DFSS methodology focuses on designing a process or product that is capable of meeting customer requirements from the outset, rather than attempting to fix the problems after the process or product has been developed.

DFSS typically consists of five phases, which are similar to the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control) methodology used in Six Sigma:

Define: In this phase, the project team defines the goals of the design project, identifies the customer requirements, and determines the critical-to-quality (CTQ) characteristics of the product or service.

Measure: The team gathers data on the CTQ characteristics and establishes a baseline for the design.

Analyze: The team analyzes the data to identify the factors that are most important to the CTQ characteristics, and identifies potential sources of variation.

Design: In this phase, the team develops a new design or modifies an existing design to meet the CTQ characteristics.

Verify: The team tests the new design to ensure that it meets the customer requirements and achieves Six Sigma quality levels.

DFSS incorporates a range of statistical tools, such as design of experiments (DOE), statistical process control (SPC), and reliability analysis, to develop robust designs that are capable of meeting customer requirements and achieving Six Sigma quality levels. The goal of DFSS is to create a product or service that is designed to be error-free, and which requires minimal or no rework or defect correction during its lifetime.

Bench marking

Benchmarking is a process used to compare an organization’s performance or processes against best practices or industry standards. The goal of benchmarking is to identify opportunities for improvement and to adopt the best practices of other organizations.

There are several types of benchmarking, including:

Internal benchmarking: Comparing performance within an organization between different departments, teams or business units.

Competitive benchmarking: Comparing performance against direct competitors in the same industry.

Functional benchmarking: Comparing performance against organizations in other industries that perform similar functions.

Generic benchmarking: Comparing performance against organizations in other industries that have similar processes or functions.

The benchmarking process usually involves the following steps:

Identify what needs to be benchmarked: This involves identifying the process, function or performance metric that needs to be benchmarked.

Identify benchmarking partners: This involves identifying organizations that have best practices or processes that can be used as benchmarks.

Collect data: This involves collecting data on the processes or performance metrics being benchmarked.